Carlo Alberto Caniato vs Timofey Stepanov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: In recent form, Stepanov has a slight edge, securing 46.86% of points on second serve compared to Caniato's 45.09%. Does this indicate a higher match prediction accuracy for Stepanov? Yes, it suggests a possible advantage.
• Return Game Stats: Stepanov leads in this category, winning 45.5% of opponents' second serve points and 30.69% of first serve returns. Caniato, on the other hand, secures 41.4% and 23%, respectively. This indicates a strong return game for Stepanov.
• Under Pressure Analysis: Caniato has a slight advantage in saving breakpoints, with 54.36% compared to Stepanov's 53.19%. Could this help Caniato during crucial moments? Possibly.
• Performance Overview: Over the last year, Stepanov has a superior win rate of 73.33% compared to Caniato's 64.52%. Is Stepanov more consistent? The stats suggest so.
• Best Surface: Both players excel on clay, with Caniato outperforming slightly at 60% compared to Stepanov's 57%. However, neither favors I.hard, with Stepanov at 36% and Caniato yet to win.
• Player Level: Stepanov and Caniato have played primarily in Futures/ITF $10K events, with Stepanov winning 73.33% of those matches and Caniato winning 67.27%.
• Opponent Quality Stats: Stepanov has faced more challenging opposition, with an average opponent ranking of 83.27, whereas Caniato's average opponent ranks at 427.85. Does this give Stepanov an edge? Likely so.
• Deciding Set Performance: Stepanov is stronger in deciding sets with a 67% win rate, surpassing Caniato's 56% over the past year. Who handles pressure better? The figures favor Stepanov.
• Break Point Conversion: Caniato excels here, converting 34.55% of opportunities, much higher than Stepanov's 19.15%. Could this be critical in key moments? Definitely a factor to consider.

Editorial Prediction (August 18, 2025, UTC):

As we analyze the current stats, it's evident that Stepanov has a stronger second serve and return game, which are highly indicative of match outcomes. Furthermore, Stepanov's experience against higher-ranked opponents and their superior performance in deciding sets hint at an advantage in this matchup.

Caniato, however, shows resilience with a higher breakpoint conversion rate and slightly better performance under pressure by saving more breakpoints. This could be pivotal during crucial phases of the match.

Comparative analysis of recent performances suggests that despite Caniato's strengths in converting break points, Stepanov's overall game, experience, and consistency provide a likely edge. Thus, based on the statistical evidence, Stepanov appears to be the predicted winner of this upcoming tennis match.